the possibility of loss of legitimacy and a dynasty being succeeded by another. This also
applies to the entire Chinese vassal system. The overlord State, through virtuous
governance, manages the relations it maintains with its vassals. The latter, in turn,
offered different tributes to the Son of Heaven, though it did not mean that they could
not take power in the future. Confronted with the loss of legitimacy, an alliance of vassal
States had the right to rebel against the overlord (Zhao, 2019: 15). But how are these
concepts still present in current Chinese leadership?
As far as Xi Jinping's presidency is concerned, the legitimacy of his governance comes in
the first instance from the centralization of power in his personality. In 2018, at the 19th
Congress of the CCP, the centralization of power upon him was complete from a formal
point of view. In addition to the designation of lingxiu 领袖 (leader), Xi's thinking was also
included in the constitution and is expected to remain in power beyond 2022 (Jash, 2018:
1 and 2). This outcome was made possible to a large extent by the major anti-corruption
campaign that eliminated several of Xi's political opponents and by centralizing control
over the Armed Forces in the president's figure (Jash, 2018: 3). In this way, President
Xi consolidates his position as the supreme leader, opening the possibility to develop
projects that extend Chinese power internationally, namely the Belt and Road Initiative
and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.
For China and Xi Jinping, this is a way of offering an alternative to the world and achieving
a higher level of development through cooperation mechanisms. We note, however, that
the ideas of Zhou's kingdom and Confucianism are present in the rhetoric and political
actions of PRC. This statement is founded on the concepts of justice and virtue. The latter
is of special prominence. For Confucius, it is a gift that man receives from Heaven and
only a virtuous government can guarantee that citizens can improve themselves:
Guide them (the common people) by virtue, keep them in line with the rites,
and they will, besides having sense of shame, reform themselves. (Confucius,
II. 3: 63).
Governing by virtue will derive from the same governing system as the Zhou Dynasty.
In general, the benefits should be universal, i.e., there must be a fair and equitable
distribution of the gains that are obtained. For Zhao (2019), it is about maximizing
earnings for everyone and not just a restricted group of people. Given the military
limitations of the Zhou rulers, investment in virtuous leadership proved to be the best
option proven by the longevity of this dynasty:
The Duke of Zhou’s political consciousness discovered a true political
concept: rule by force is not politics, but just a way of ruling; true politics
is an art that creates universal cooperation and coexistence. In that sense,
Zhou’s tianxia system is not merely a political experiment, but also an
ideal political concept (Zhao 2019: 9).
The same concept appears to be being promoted by the current Chinese government. In
the communiqué of the 4th Plenary of the 18th Central Committee of the CCP comes the
expression "combine the rule of law with the rule of virtue" (China, 2014), alluding to the
Confucian concept. Justice or just actions end up deriving from the concept of virtue.
Under this light, despite the importance of national interests for China, this should not
be achieved by unfair means. However, these same goals, warns Kallio (2016), should