the Accident; Public Participation in Decision Making Process Tokenism; Referendum
Demand; People's Interest in Public Participation after the Fukushima Accident; Access
to the Court; Judicial Redress with Respect to the Impact of Environmental Decisions;
Judicial Review with Respect to Environmental Decision Making; Barriers to Access to the
Court and Socially Fair Results.
Chapter six provides a detailed discussion to interpret the book's principal findings
regarding past research on the FNA and EHRs. It is divided into three sections: first, it
discusses the extent to which the FNA represents a human rights problem in terms of its
environmental impact, which is the central research question addressed in the empirical
chapters; second, it examines the relationship between substantive and procedural rights
in Fukushima, and critically evaluates the challenges and opportunities of an energy
policy that recognizes public participation in decision-making, which is propagate in the
empirical chapters; and third, it examines the relationship between substantive and
procedural rights in Fukushima. Finally, some of the study's limitations are discussed and
suggested future research fields. The main findings of the study were discussed here,
and a detailed analysis was obtained. In this direction, the following topics are
emphasized: The Relationship Between Human Rights, the Environment, and Nuclear
Energy in Japan; Cross-Cutting Issues between Japan's Human Rights and Nuclear
Energy Policy; Human Rights Violations Raised by the Fukushima Nuclear Accident;
Reinterpretation of Human Rights Versus Right to the Environment; The Linkage Between
Substantive and Procedural Rights; The Linkages Between Violation of the Right to
Information and the Enjoyment of the Right to Health; The Lack of the Right to Public
Participation and the Enjoyment of the Right to Health (pp. 174-205).
This work, which I had the opportunity to evaluate in detail above, appears as a candidate
to make significant contributions in its field. In particular, it is observed that this highly
accessible guide is up-to-date and makes a noteworthy contribution to the literature in
terms of bringing environmental issues and human rights issues together. Dr Akyüz
reveals that there is a positive interaction between ecological problems and human rights,
especially from a Japanese perspective. While demonstrating this, he not only remained
under the monopoly of Japan but also added a broad perspective by addressing similar
problems that had been experienced before. The academic world, which constantly points
to ancient events and accidents in the analysis of environmental issues, will now have
the opportunity to understand better the issues of the region's people in the face of much
more recent negativities with such accidents. Of course, this work, which was revealed
only with the example of Fukushima, will not be enough on its own. However, this work
would definitely encourage especially young academics to examine more current events
regarding environmental issues.
The method in which the study was presented, the language used, and the detailed
presentation of the findings can be seen as one of the most important advantages. It is
also noteworthy that an empirical method was used in the study, and those policy
recommendations were given as a result of the findings. The results obtained in work
bring a different perspective to the current understanding of the relationship between
human rights and the environment. In addition, a discussion of Japan's contribution to
nuclear energy policy and management and the theoretical, methodological and empirical
study of nuclear accidents will also be valuable to scientists working in this field. Overall,