attempt to ensure a continued military presence in those maritime areas, particularly in
Yemen, are an example of this.
Washington will certainly want to maintain the command of the sea inthe Horn of
Africa, that its status as a maritime power of excellence has enabled throughout the
century, and it is not expected that the ongoing USA military retraction throughout the
ME will be followed in that region and, consequently, in the maritime spaces
surrounding the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. In this context, Djibouti's military base assumes
increased preponderance not only for USA to secure control over a fundamental strait
for international maritime trade, in particular energy, such as Bab el-Mandeb, but also
as a way of containing any expansionist attempt by China in the region, especially after
Beijing has managed to establish its first military base out of its doors, precisely in the
territory of Djibouti.
China's choice to build that military infrastructure has raised alarms in USA. On the one
hand, because this action undermines their strategic interests, calling into question its
long-standing dominance in the region, both economically and militarily. On the other
hand, because they consider that China's so far limited role in the region can be
understood as an incentive for a more significant future military presence. And it is
indeed expected that this will happen, as a more robust presence of China in the Horn
of Africa will serve a dual purpose: to ensure the safety of the BRI maritime route,
which crosses the Gulf of Aden, the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, and the Red Sea; also, to
balance Washington's traditional influence in that region.In this sense, China's actions
in Djibouti will certainly influence its ambitions for power in the region, especially when
it intends to assume itself as a relevant maritime power.
Russia, for its part, seeks to return to a level of significant influence in the region it has
held in the past, in the Soviet Union era, especially by establishing at least one military
base in Aden, Yemen, very close to the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. This revisionist stance
collides, however, with the American hegemonic claims and the clear rise of China. We
can therefore face in the long term the coexistence of military infrastructure of the
three global powers, separated only by a few tens of nautical miles. Tensions between
them in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and surrounding areas will be inevitable.
The maritime spaces of the Red Sea, Horn of Africa and Gulf of Aden have in fact
become successively more securitized over the past decade, leading to an
unprecedented militarisation of the region, with USA, China, and Russia taking a very
active part in this process. However, the interest of these actors in ensuring that
international maritime trade, especially energy, is not threatened, leads to the thought
that safe passage into the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is not called into question, and this is
perhaps the only relationship of convergence between them. However, the other
relationships that could be identified between the global powers are of opposition. And
it is even expected that we will continue to walk a path centered on a seemingly
endless cycle of sharp growth of geopolitical disputes in the region at the global level.
We conclude by stating that it was possible to prove that the Bab el-Mandeb Strait and
adjacent maritime spaces, in particular because of the relevance they have to
international maritime trade and the possibility of asserting and projecting power of the
actors present there, are, nowadays, an important stage of geopolitical competition of
the global powers (USA, China, and Russia), and that the disputes between them are in
an ascending phase.