can produce multiple direct, indirect,
immediate, distant effects (even if certain societies may appear to be impervious to a set
of phenomena).
This situation underlies an intensive digitalization of our lives, exposed to a continuous
flow of information and frequent sharing. The rapid circulation of networked information
shapes incessant opinions, in a public debate increasingly marked by issues of a
globalizing nature. Aware of this situation, public agents (governments, political agents,
interest groups and corporations) give primacy to the communicative phenomenon as a
strategic “arsenal” for negotiation and domination.
We glimpse an relinquishment of the perception of communication as a soft power
phenomenon, of common knowledge and which would be difficult to
summarize here, would be the illustrative paradigm of the use of communication as a
definition of power relations in the international scene. This is the starting point for this
thematic issue. The articles that comprise this dossier address this issue in several
significant aspects.
A first group discusses the importance of digital tools at the service of what is advocated
as “cyber-diplomacy”. A first consideration addresses the scenario of technological
migration to the 5G reality, which opens up fierce disputes between States, taking into
account the security and defence issues that it raises (Text 1; Muñoz-Satre, Rodrigo-
Martín and Rodrigo-Martín). A second text assesses Qatar's communication strategy to
rehabilitate its international credibility. The procedures operated from a crisis
management situation are discussed, after this country of the Arabian Peninsula was
accused by its neighbours of supporting terrorist causes, becoming the target of
international sanctions (text 9; González).
A second set discusses misinformation issues. Text 3 (Guzmán and Rodríguez-Cánovas)
comprehensively analyses the strategies used by States to spread false information with
the clear intention of gaining political dividends. This issue materializes in a more
concrete way in the reflection that proposes a look at the existing tension between the
European Union and the misinformation attacks conducted by the Chinese and Russian
agendas (text 6; Benedicto).
Text 10 by Magallón-Rosa and Sánchez-Duarte relates misinformation issues in the
context of the pandemic, comparing southern European countries. It bridges the gap
between the topic of misinformation and the current pandemic context we are
experiencing. This is the third guiding axis of this issue of Janus.net, e-journal of
international relations, which includes two more texts to complement the reflection on
the epidemic. An article addresses the communication mechanisms used by European
and Portuguese entities that oversee the management of vaccines, to communicate the
vaccination plan (text 11; Santos et al). A second article looks at the phenomenon of